Is keyhole surgery a better option than open surgery?

In my opinion, yes. It is a better option as it's significantly less painful, less invasive, and there's a quicker healing time. The pet can return to normal activity, like chasing a ball and running around the backyard in significantly less time than with traditional open surgery. We can more readily perform diagnostic procedures that might otherwise be too cost-prohibitive because open surgery for obtaining biopsies is more expensive or just too invasive for clients to agree to. This minimally invasive keyhole laparoscopic procedure to obtain biopsies or other diagnostic procedures often presents a much lower barrier for clients. They more easily say, "Yes, I want to understand what's going on better so that we can treat my pet more appropriately." In many different ways, it is a better option than open surgery.

With that said, there are limitations. We still need to go into the abdomen with certain surgeries because the laparoscopic minimally invasive technique is not enough. For example, if we have a splenic tumor and we need to remove the spleen, it can't be done effectively through a small port incision. It will require a full open surgery to get the best outcome. So there are certain situations where it's not better, but in most common procedures, it provides a great alternative because of all these discussed reasons.